Open Peer Review Reports for: Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement “Sepsis Six”
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sep 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Jan 2015 | Author responded | Author comments - Siri Steinmo |
| 27 Sep 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers |
| 11 Oct 2015 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Presseau |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jan 2015 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Jan 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Feb 2016 | Article published | 10.1186/s13012-016-0376-8 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
