Skip to main content

Table 3 Reasons for removal due to PVC-related complications and elective reasons

From: Effects of computer reminders on complications of peripheral venous catheters and nurses’ adherence to a guideline in paediatric care—a cluster randomised study

 

Intervention

Control

 

Baseline (n = 626)

Post-intervention (n = 618)

Baseline (n = 724)

Post-intervention (n = 674)

Reasons for removal of PVCs due to complications

n (%)

254 (40.6 %)

259 (41.9 %)

292 (40.3 %)

316 (46.9 %)

 95 % CI

36.7–44.5

38.0–45.8

36.8–44.0

43.1–50.7

Infiltration including extravasation, n (%)

105 (17.1)

108 (17.5)

73 (10.1)

103 (15.3)

Occlusion, n (%)

88 (14.1)

94 (15.2)

130 (18.0)

119 (17.7)

Sign and symptoms of thrombophlebitis, n (%)

37 (5.9)

34 (5.5)

63 (8.7)

67 (9.9)

PVC accidentally removed, n (%)

20 (3.2)

18 (2.9)

20 (2.8)

23 (3.4)

Suspicion of infection, n (%)

3 (0.5)

4 (0.6)

5 (0.7)

2 (0.3)

Wound (pressure wound), n (%)

1 (0.2)

1 (0.2)

1 (0.1)

2 (0.3)

Elective reasons for removal of PVCa

n (%)

372 (59.4 %)

359 (58.1 %)

432 (59.7 %)

358 (53.1 %)

 95 % CI

55.5–63.3

54.1–62.0

56.0–63.2

49.3–56.9

  1. aIncluded completed treatment; the patient is bothered by the PVC, PVC re-sited in connection to blood sampling, or change to central venous access device and other reasons (e.g., location dependent, been inserted too long, and blood at insertion site)