Skip to main content

Table 3 Models estimating the marginal proportional hazards of stopping the sustainment of A-CRA

From: Associations between implementation characteristics and evidence-based practice sustainment: a study of the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach

Characteristics

Estimate

SE

Lower

Upper

Chi-square

p value

Wald CL

Wald CL

Setting

 Org. focus

−1.90

0.53

−2.93

−0.86

12.95

<0.001*

 No. of services

−0.06

0.07

−0.21

0.09

0.57

0.45

 Communications

0.02

0.03

−0.04

0.08

0.42

0.52

 Funding stability

−0.20

0.05

−0.31

−0.09

13.64

<0.001*

 Org. capacity

0.04

0.04

−0.03

0.12

1.22

0.27

 Partnerships

−0.01

0.04

−0.08

0.07

0.03

0.87

 Political support

−0.09

0.04

−0.16

−0.01

4.92

0.03**

 Prog. adaptation

0.08

0.05

−0.03

0.18

2.13

0.14

 Prog. evaluation

0.05

0.05

−0.04

0.14

1.06

0.30

 Strategic planning

−0.01

0.03

−0.08

0.06

0.06

0.81

Implementation

 No. of clinicians

−0.88

0.24

−1.36

−0.41

13.16

<0.001*

 No. of supervisors

−0.32

0.32

−0.94

0.31

1.00

0.32

 No. of youth

−0.01

0.01

−0.02

−0.01

4.93

<0.03**

Intervention

 Complexity

0.41

0.11

0.20

0.62

14.27

<0.001*

 Imp. difficulty

0.21

0.09

0.04

0.38

5.60

0.02**

 Perc. success

−0.03

0.08

−0.18

0.12

0.18

0.67

 Rel. advantage

−0.13

0.08

−0.29

0.03

2.48

0.11

  1. SE standard errors, CL confidence levels
  2. *Statistical significance at false discovery rate of 0.05
  3. **False discover rate of 0.10