Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of intervention characteristics and results

From: The effectiveness of interventions to improve laboratory requesting patterns among primary care physicians: a systematic review

Reference

Setting

Design

Participants

Type

Intervention

Comparator

Follow-up

Effect of intervention

Horn et al. [17]

USA

ITS

215 primary care physicians (5 group practices)

Changing order form

Cost displays within electronic health record at time of ordering (153 physicians)

Control group: no cost information (62 physicians)

12 months pre- and 6 months post-intervention

Difference-in-difference approach. 1–2.6 % reduction. 20 % The cost displays resulted in a reduction of 0.4–5.6 laboratory orders per 1000 visits per month (p < 0.001)

Kahan et al. [26]

Israel

CBA

Not disclosed

Changing order form

A new version of electronic order form

Older version of computerised order form

6 months pre- and 4 months post-intervention

31–41 % reduction relative to the pre-intervention month, with 36–58 % reduction the following month. −2–3 % changes for control tests

Shalev et al. [27]

Israel

CBA

865 primary care physicians

Changing order form

Changing volume of tests on order form (27 tests removed and 2 tests added—reducing the number of tests available using a check-box form from 51 to 26)

Standard form prior to intervention

12 months pre- and 24 months post-intervention

For deleted tests, there was a 27 % and 19.2 % reduction 1 and 2 years after intervention, respectively

Zaat et al. [46]

Netherlands

CBA

75 primary care physicians

Changing order form

Volume of tests on order form reduced (hand written request if test not displayed) (47 physicians)

Standard form (28 physicians)

Five month pre-intervention (control) and 12 months post-intervention

18 % reduction in number of tests requested monthly in experimental group after the intervention compared to the control doctors

Barrichi et al. [25]

Italy

CBA

44 primary care physicians

Education

Pathology-specific laboratory algorithms for 7 common clinical scenarios were tested. Education was provided (8 training sessions) to the physicians about the algorithms and their use (23 physicians)

Current practice

12 months pre- and 12 months post-intervention (data on test requests for randomly selected 30 days in each period)

5 % reduction in the volume of tests requested by the intervention district 1 year following the intervention (retrospective audit) compared with a 1 % increase in the control district

Larsson et al. [18]

Sweden

CBA

63 primary care physicians (19 practices)

Education

An education programme (2-day lecture series)

Current practice (2 practices)

5 months pre-intervention and 4 months post-intervention

7 ratios were recommended to decrease in volume, 5 did at p < 0.05. 7 were expected to increase in volume, 4 did at p < 0.05

Verstappen et al. [21]

Netherlands

RCT

174 primary care physicians (26 practices)

Education

A primary care physician-based strategy focused on clinical problems and associated tests (85 physicians in arm a and 89 physicians in arm b)

Each group acted as a control for the other

6 months pre- and 6 months post-intervention

12 % reduction in volume of total tests in intervention group versus no change in control arm. 16 % reduction of inappropriate tests for intervention group

van Wijk et al. [22]

Netherlands

RCT

60 primary care physicians (44 practices)

Guidelines

Guideline-based order form (29 GPs) versus restricted guideline-based electronic order form (31 GPs)

Each group acted as a control for the other

Study period: 1 July 1994–30 June 1995

Decision support based on guidelines is more effective in changing blood test ordering than decision support based on initially displaying a limited number of tests. Primary care physicians who used BloodLink-Guideline requested 20 % fewer tests on average than did practitioners who used BloodLink-Restricted (mean (±SD), 5.5 ± 0.9 tests versus 6.9 ± 1.6 tests (p = 0.003))

Baker et al. [23]

UK

RCT

96 primary care physicians (33 practices)

Guidelines and feedback

58 GPs (17 practices) guidelines followed by feedback about the numbers of thyroid function, rheumatoid factor test and urine cultures they ordered (quarterly for 1 year)

38 GPs (16 practices) received guidelines then feedback about lipid and plasma viscosity tests (each a control group for the other)

Baseline and 1 year post-intervention

No effect. No change in volume of tests per 1000 requested in either of the study groups for any of the tests

Thomas et al. [19]

UK

RCT

370 primary care physicians (85 practices)

Feedback and education

Quarterly feedback of requesting rates and reminder messages. Practices allocated to 1 of 4 groups: control (20 practices), enhanced feedback alone (22 practices), reminder messages alone (22 practices) or both enhanced feedback and reminder messages (21 practices)

Current practice

12 months pre- and post-intervention

11 % reduction in requests for practices receiving enhanced feedback or reminder messages (OR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.83–0.93) compared with control group

Tomlin et al. [24]

New Zealand

CBA

3160, 3140 and 3335 primary care physicians

Guidelines, feedback and education

3 marketing programmes (guidelines, individual feedback and professional development)

Locum and other physicians not targeted by the programmes

2 years pre- and post-intervention

60 % reduction in number of ESR tests by the intervention group following the intervention versus an 18 % reduction in comparison doctors after intervention