Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Table 4 Vote counting across three conceptualisations of recovery in practice

#	Study ID	Country	Profession	Setting	Clinical recovery	Personal recovery	Service-defined recovery
1	Aston 2012 [15]	UK	Nurses	In-patient	X
2	Gilburt 2013 [18]	UK	Team leaders	Across settings	X	X	X
3	Tickle 2012 [35]	UK	Clinical psychologists	Across settings	X	X	X
4	Turton 2010 [36]	Europe	MDT	In-patient	X	X
5	Felton 2006 [29]	USA	MDT	Community	X	X	X
6	Sullivan 2013 [25]	USA	Case managers	Community	X	X
7	Sullivan 2012 [28]	USA	Case managers	Community		X
8	Rice 2009 [19]	USA	Case managers	Community			X
9	Watson 2011 [20]	USA	MDT	Across settings	X	X	X
10	Rogers 2007 [18]	USA	Psychiatrists	Across settings	X	X	X
11	Dunlap 2009 [27]	USA	Social workers	Not known	X	X	X
12	Courtney 2013 [21]	Australia	Social workers	Community	X	X	X
13	Vanlith 2009 [37]	Australia	Art therapists	Community		X
14	Cleary 2013 [26]	Australia	Nurses	In-patient	X	X	X
15	Hungerford 2013 [38]	Australia	MDT	Not known		X
16	Battersby 2012 [39]	Canada	MDT	Community	X	X
17	Schwartz 2013 [40]	Canada	MDT	Community	X	X
18	Kidd 2014 [41]	Canada	MDT	In-patient	X	X
19	Piat 2012 [22]	Canada	MDT	Across settings	X	X	X
20	Ng 2008 [16]	Hong Kong	Psychiatrists	Across settings	X		X
21	Kaewprom 2011 [24]	Thailand	Nurses	In-patient	X	X
22	Cone 2012 [23]	New Zealand	Occupational therapists	Across settings		X	X
Total					17	19	12

ISSN: 1748-5908