Skip to main content

Table 4 Vote counting across three conceptualisations of recovery in practice

From: Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

# Study ID Country Profession Setting Clinical recovery Personal recovery Service-defined recovery
1 Aston 2012 [15] UK Nurses In-patient X   
2 Gilburt 2013 [18] UK Team leaders Across settings X X X
3 Tickle 2012 [35] UK Clinical psychologists Across settings X X X
4 Turton 2010 [36] Europe MDT In-patient X X  
5 Felton 2006 [29] USA MDT Community X X X
6 Sullivan 2013 [25] USA Case managers Community X X  
7 Sullivan 2012 [28] USA Case managers Community   X  
8 Rice 2009 [19] USA Case managers Community    X
9 Watson 2011 [20] USA MDT Across settings X X X
10 Rogers 2007 [18] USA Psychiatrists Across settings X X X
11 Dunlap 2009 [27] USA Social workers Not known X X X
12 Courtney 2013 [21] Australia Social workers Community X X X
13 Vanlith 2009 [37] Australia Art therapists Community   X  
14 Cleary 2013 [26] Australia Nurses In-patient X X X
15 Hungerford 2013 [38] Australia MDT Not known   X  
16 Battersby 2012 [39] Canada MDT Community X X  
17 Schwartz 2013 [40] Canada MDT Community X X  
18 Kidd 2014 [41] Canada MDT In-patient X X  
19 Piat 2012 [22] Canada MDT Across settings X X X
20 Ng 2008 [16] Hong Kong Psychiatrists Across settings X   X
21 Kaewprom 2011 [24] Thailand Nurses In-patient X X  
22 Cone 2012 [23] New Zealand Occupational therapists Across settings   X X
Total 17 19 12