| Stakeholder meeting | Local opinion leader | Train the trainer | Local training workshops | Tools and materials to prompt recommended behaviours |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rationale for intervention component | Findings from interviews: Organisational and TDF factors | Findings from interviews: Organisational factors Cochrane EPOC reviews | Findings from interviews: Organisational and TDF factors Cochrane EPOC reviews feasibility information | Findings from interviews: Organisational and TDF factors Cochrane EPOC reviews feasibility information | Findings from interviews: Organisational and TDF factors Cochrane EPOC reviews feasibility information |
Intervention content | Provide an opportunity to create buy-in at an organisational level and for senior leadership to express support. Provide opportunity to start conversation with stakeholders within hospital (outside ED) Key recommended behaviours and supporting evidence | Recruitment of local opinion leaders (one senior nurse and one medical lead from each participating hospital) to lead the project and train staff | Training and education including information/education on the key recommended practices and consequences of performing and not performing the behaviours, persuasive messages, skill development, modelling/demonstration and planning/implementation | Information/education on the key recommended practices and consequences of performing and not performing the behaviours, persuasive messages, skill development, modelling/demonstration | PTA assessment tool. Evidence-based discharge information sheet in different languages CT clinical decision tools lanyards. Checklist reminder stickers for patient records |
Endorsement letters from relevant ED colleges. Practicalities of how these will be implemented including discussion of local pathways and protocols and how to overcome anticipated barriers to implementation | Â | Leadership and change management training (e.g. information on the importance and content of the role of the clinical leads) | Â | Posters providing information on the evidence-based approach to managing patients with mTBI | |
Characteristics of those delivering the intervention | Senior research team clinicians | Not applicable | Senior research team clinicians | Local opinion leaders (nurse and medical) | Research team |
Clinical opinion leaders | |||||
Characteristics of the recipient(s) | Local stakeholders (both clinical as well as change management, e.g. ED Director, nominated local opinion leaders and other stakeholders such as occupational therapists or radiologists) | Not applicable | Local opinion leaders—one senior nurse and one medical lead from each participating hospital | Staff in the Emergency Department responsible for the management of mTBI patients. | Local opinion leaders and staff in the Emergency Department responsible for the management of mTBI patients. |
Setting | Participating hospitals | Participating hospitals | Off-site conference venue | Participating hospitals | Participating hospitals |
Relevant BCTs for PTA behaviour | Information regarding behaviour, outcome. | Not applicable | Information regarding behaviour, outcome | Information regarding behaviour, outcome | Environmental changes |
Health consequences | Antecedents | Antecedents | Information regarding behaviour, outcome | ||
Persuasive communication | Health consequences | Health consequences | Â | ||
Social processes of encouragement, pressure, support | Goal/target specified behaviour or outcome | Graded task, starting with easy tasks | |||
Graded task, starting with easy tasks | Increasing skills: problem solving, decision making, goal setting | ||||
Increasing skills: problem solving, decision making, goal setting | Modelling/demonstration of behaviour of others | ||||
Rehearsal of relevant skills | Persuasive communication | ||||
Modelling/demonstration of behaviour of others | Social processes of encouragement, pressure, support | ||||
Persuasive communication | Pros and Cons | ||||
Social processes of encouragement, pressure, support | Vicarious reinforcement | ||||
Pros and Cons | Social and environmental consequences | ||||
Vicarious reinforcement | Salience of consequences | ||||
Social and environmental consequences | Â | ||||
Salience of consequences | |||||
Focus on past success | |||||
Mode of delivery | Face-to-face meeting | One medical and nursing lead | Mixed, interactive and didactic workshop | Face to face workshops (mixed or clinician group specific depending on current training infrastructure in participating hospitals) | Printed copies |
Online presentations available for those not able to attend workshops | Online versions | ||||
 | CT decision rules provided as lanyards | ||||
Intensity or dose | One meeting | Part-time | Two events in different Australian states | 1 brief presentation per clinical topic, 1 demonstration session | For use with every patient |
Number of repeats left to LOLs | |||||
Duration | One hour in length | Duration of the project | Full day | 10–20 min per session | Not applicable |