The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study

Table 2 Pairwise comparisons of blocks and enablers between intervention categories

Item	Pharmacological versus psychosocial	Psychosocial versus recovery	Pharmacological versus recovery
Item	χ²(df), p, </>, odds ratio	χ²(df), p, </>, odds ratio	χ²(df), p, </>, odds ratio
B1—Training	4.825(1)	2.501(1)	11.259(1)
B1—Training	0.047	0.180	0.002
B2—Complexity	17.413(1)	0.673(1)	19.763(1)
	<0.001	0.435	<0.001
	<	-	<
	24.585	-	37.800
B3—Time	-	0.002(1)	-
B3—Time	N/A^a	1.000	N/A^a
B4—Support	-	1.198(1)	-
B4—Support	N/A^a	0.313	N/A^a
B5—Personnel	4.825(1)	11.244(1)	22.850(1)
	0.047	0.002	<0.001
	-	-	<
	-	-	46.667
B6—Material	-	0.303(1)	-
	N/A^a	1.000	N/A^a
	-	0.546	-
B7—Costs	-	2.768(1)	-
B7—Costs	N/A^a	0.126	N/A^a
B8—Harms	N/A^a	N/A^a	N/A^a
E1- Population	0.443(1)	0.001(1)	0.224(1)
E1- Population	0.737	1.000	0.638
E2- Manualisation	25.546(1)	0.001(1)	19.763(1)
	<0.001	1.000	<0.001
	<	-	<
	38.294	-	37.800
E3- Flexibility	19.320(1)	0.299(1)	14.600(1)
	<0.001	0.788	<0.001
	<	-	<
	7.000	-	9.479
E4- Effectiveness	2.389(1)	2.299(1)	0.147(1)
E4- Effectiveness	0.149	0.176	1.000
E5—Saving	-	3.449(1)	-
E5—Saving	N/A^a	0.127	N/A^a
E6—Goals	N/A^a	N/A^a	N/A^a
E7—Pilot	-	3.771(1)	-
E7—Pilot	N/A^a	0.114	N/A^a
E8—Reversibility	N/A^a	N/A^a	N/A^a

ISSN: 1748-5908