Skip to main content

Table 2 Teacher patterns of implementation and post-implementation perceptions, program ownership, perceived student benefit, and comfort level in teaching intervention curriculum

From: Factors influencing implementation dose and fidelity thereof and related student outcomes of an evidence-based national HIV prevention program

  

Clusters

 

Variables

Overall

High Implementation Group

Moderate Implementation Group

Low Implementation Group

χ 2

p

Cluster sizes

 

31.7%

52.8%

15.6%

  

Importance of HIV prevention for grade 6 youth in general

      

Somewhat important/not at all

10.3%

5.1%

13.6%

11.1%

2.81

0.2460

Very important

89.7%

94.9%

86.4%

88.9%

  

Importance of Focus on Youth for grade 6 youth in your school

      

Somewhat important/not at all

17.8%

3.5%

20.9%

40.0%

17.20

0.0002

Very important

82.2%

96.5%

79.1%

60.0%

  

Having other priorities (than teaching FOYC)

      

No

64.3%

84.1%

57.1%

48.4%

16.56

0.0003

Yes

35.7%

15.9%

42.9%

51.6%

  

Perceived benefits of FOY curriculum for grade 6 students

      

Somewhat/not at all

23.7%

6.8%

25.0%

57.7%

26.04

<0.0001

Very much

76.3%

93.2%

75.0%

42.3%

  

FOY curriculum is a Bahamian curriculum

      

Somewhat/not at all

41.0%

27.6%

41.0%

72.0%

14.25

0.0008

Very much

59.0%

72.4%

59.0%

28.0%

  

Compared to the time spent teaching reading skills in grade six, the time spent teaching FOYC was:

      

Less important

17.7%

10.2%

22.7%

18.2%

3.82

0.1482

About the same/more important

82.3%

89.8%

77.3%

81.8%

  

Student engagement in core activities (range 1–3 points)a

2.85 (0.23)

2.87 (0.21)

2.87 (0.19)

2.79 (0.29)

1.82

0.1648

Comfort level in teaching core activities (range 1–3 points)a

2.82 (0.24)

2.87 (0.16)

2.83 (0.24)

2.74 (0.30)

3.13

0.0459

  1. Note: aF test was used.