|
Title and abstract
|
The title (or abstract if word count of title precludes) should include a description of the methodology (e.g. phase IV implementation study, cluster randomised implementation trial, interrupted time series, before and after, stepped wedge study).
|
79%
|
|
Introduction
|
Include a description of the wider health care/policy/commercial context.
|
58%
|
|
Describe any pilot implementation work and the conclusions from that work.
|
63%
|
|
Methods (the new service)
|
What is the relation of components of the intervention to the rationale for the new service design and/or theory underpinning implementation discussed above?
|
30%
|
|
Define role of the researchers in design and implementation.
|
79%
|
|
Methods (population)
|
If applicable, describe any consent required (which should be to the new service and not to research).
|
53%
|
|
Describe recruitment of any sub-groups recruited for additional research tasks (e.g. questionnaire completion, physiological measures, detailed record analysis).
|
47%
|
|
Results (population)
|
Report details of any subgroups recruited to specific research tasks (e.g. questionnaire completion, physiological testing) as opposed to the clinical service. Compare characteristics of any sub-groups to the whole eligible population.
|
74%
|
|
Discussion (population)
|
Include a structured abstract (for example including summary of findings, strengths and limitations, comparison with other studies, conclusions and implications).
|
58%
|
|
Reflect on the processes of implementing the service, barriers or facilitators and lessons learned.
|
79%
|
|
How did the setting enable or hinder the implementation of the new service?
|
79%
|
|
How was the new service was implemented highlighting (if relevant) variations between sites and over time and the impact on treatment outcomes and unintended consequences?
|
74%
|
