From: The role of evidence and context for implementing a multimodal intervention to increase HIV testing
 | Evidence weak | Evidence strong |
---|---|---|
Context strong | Little HIV in this populationa | HIV testing is critical a |
Population is elderly and monogamousa | Professionalism of providers—believe that HIV testing is doing the right thing a | |
Testing is a low prioritya | Strong clinical champion b | |
Strong clinical championb | External environment of HIV testing in the community b | |
Lots of current testingb | Organizational support for doing testing b | |
Organizational support for doing testingb | CR viewed as facilitative and not burdensome b | |
CR viewed as facilitative and not burdensomeb | ||
Context weak | Little HIV in this populationa | Agree HIV testing is importanta |
Population is elderly and monogamousa | Evidence considered good for testinga | |
Testing is a low prioritya | Difficult to talk about HIV/sex in this regionb | |
Difficult to talk about HIV/sex in this regionb | Insufficient staff to do testingb | |
Insufficient staff to do testingb | CR overloadb | |
CR overloadb | Poor organizational structureb | |
Poor organizational structureb | No clinical championb | |
No clinical championb |