Skip to main content

Table 6 Contexts in which instruments have been used

From: The Society for Implementation Research Collaboration Instrument Review Project: A methodology to promote rigorous evaluation

Domain Construct Health careN(%) WorkplaceN(%) Mental illness/substance abuseN(%) EducationN(%) OtherN(%)
Implementation outcomes Acceptability 3 (5.88%) 0 (0.00%) 28 (54.90%) 22 (43.14%) 0 (0.00%)
Adoption 2 (8.33%) 6 (25.00%) 5 (20.83%) 5 (20.83%) 6 (25.00%)
Appropriateness 1 (14.29%) 1 (14.29%) 2 (28.57%) 1 (14.29%) 2 (28.57%)
  Feasibility 5 (35.71%) 0 (0.00%) 8 (57.14%) 3 (21.43%) 3 (21.43%)
  Penetration 1 (20.00%) 1 (20.00%) 3 (60.00%) 2 (40.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Sustainability 1 (11.11%) 3 (33.33%) 4 (44.44%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (11.11%)
Intervention characteristics Adaptability 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%)
Complexity 1 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (50.00%)
Design quality and packaging 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Evidence strength and quality 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Intervention source 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Relative advantage 1 (14.29%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (28.57%) 0 (0.00%) 4 (57.14%)
  Trialability 1 (33.33%) 0 (0.00%) 0(0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (66.67%)
Outer setting Cosmopolitanism 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  External policy and incentives 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Patient needs and resources 1 (33.33%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (66.67%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Peer pressure 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Inner setting Combined 6 (66.67%) 1 (11.11%) 1 (11.11%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (11.11%)
  Culture 1 (12.50%) 5 (62.50%) 1 (12.50%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (12.50%)
  Implementation climate 4 (26.67%) 7 (46.67%) 2 (13.33%) 1 (6.67%) 3 (20.00%)
    IC: tension for change 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    IC: compatibility 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%)
    IC: relative priority 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%)
    IC: organizational incentives and rewards 0 (0.00%) 2 (50.00%) 1 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (25.00%)
    IC: goals and feedback 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    C: learning climate 0 (0.00%) 13 (92.86%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (7.14%) 0 (0.00%)
  Networks and communications 1 (6.25%) 10 (62.50%) 4 (25.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (6.25%)
  Readiness for implementation 5 (26.32%) 1 (5.26%) 3 (15.79%) 1 (5.26%) 9 (47.37%)
    RI: leadership engagement 0 (0.00%) 1 (25.00%) 3 (75.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    RI: available resources 0 (0.00%) 1 (50.00%) 1 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    RI: access to knowledge and information 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%)
  Structural characteristics 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (50.00%)
Characteristics of individuals Knowledge and beliefs about the intervention 3 (5.36%) 4 (7.14%) 37 (66.07%) 6 (10.71%) 8 (14.29%)
  Individual stage of change 1 (16.67%) 1 (16.67%) 3 (50.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (16.67%)
  Individual identification with the organization 0 (0.00%) 5 (83.33%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (16.67%)
  Other personal attributes 2 (5.26%) 17 (44.74%) 7 (18.42%) 0 (0.00%) 12 (31.58%)
  Self-efficacy 1 (20.00%) 0 (0.00%) 2 (40.00%) 1 (20.00%) 1 (20.00%)
Process Engaging 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: opinion leaders 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 3 (100%)
    Engaging: formally appointed internal implementation leaders 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: champions 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
    Engaging: external change agents 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Executing 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%) 1 (100%) 0 (0.00%) 0 (0.00%)
  Planning 2 (7.14%) 5 (17.86%) 5 (17.86%) 0 (0.00%) 17 (60.71%)
  Reflecting and evaluating 1 (5.00%) 1 (5.00%) 8 (40.00%) 1 (5.00%) 9 (45.00%)
Client outcomes Satisfaction 2 (14.29%) 1 (7.14%) 4 (28.57%) 1 (7.14%) 6 (42.86%)
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908