Open Peer Review Reports for: Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 May 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Jun 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Harris |
| 14 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - zhanming liang |
| 10 Nov 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Moriah Ellen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Nov 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 Nov 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Harris |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Nov 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Dec 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
