Skip to main content

Table 2 Values for practice leaders’ relative commitment to improvement scores and implementation capability composite scores based on timing of initiation of DIAMOND depression care improvement

From: Assessing organizational readiness for depression care quality improvement: relative commitment and implementation capability

 

Timing of initiation: waves of practices initiating improvement

 

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Fifth

None

p c

R2

 

M (SD)

M (SD)

M (SD)

M (SD)

M (SD)

M (SD)

  

Practice leaders’ relative commitment scoresa

8.0

6.8

5.7

5.8

4.6

5.7

0.002

0.11

(0.78)

(1.0)

(1.6)

(1.5)

(2.1)

(1.6)

Depression collaborative care features in placeb

0.33

0.25

0.26

0.28

0.13

0.24

0.30

0.01

(0.15)

(0.13)

(0.20)

(0.17)

(0.11)

(0.16)

Advanced access and tracking capabilitiesb

0.58

0.59

0.58

0.60

0.44

0.58

0.69

0.00

(0.16)

(0.15)

(0.19)

(0.14)

(0.15)

(0.15)

Depression culture and attitudesb

0.79

0.73

0.76

0.62

0.60

0.66

0.05

0.05

(0.12)

(0.16)

(0.15)

(0.20)

(0.23)

(0.21)

Prior depression quality improvement activitiesb

0.50

0.28

0.37

0.34

0.15

0.28

0.03

0.06

(0.14)

(0.14)

(0.20)

(0.18)

(0.13)

(0.16)

Quality improvement culture and attitudesb

0.76

0.76

0.73

0.72

0.63

0.74

0.58

0.00

(0.09)

(0.12)

(0.17)

(0.19)

(0.26)

(0.13)

  1. aValues for practice leaders’ relative commitment to improvement scores (higher practice leaders’ relative commitment scores reflect higher relative commitment).
  2. bImplementation capability composite scores (higher implementation capability scores reflect greater presence of facilitators and/or absence of barriers).
  3. c p values and R 2 values are for the regression coefficients from a general linear regression model predicting wave from each of the relative commitment and implementation capability composites.