First author (year) and title | Review characteristics | Review findingsa | Conclusionb |
---|---|---|---|
Beach 2006 [20] | N: 27 studies | 3/4 studies reported multifaceted interventions to be more effective than a single intervention | Generally effective (75%) |
Improving Health Care Quality for Racial/Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review of the Best Evidence Regarding Provider and Organization Interventions | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, clinical trials | • 1/1 study favoured multifaceted vs. reminders | |
Populations: physicians, nurses, other | • 1/1 study favoured multifaceted vs. distribution of educational materials | ||
Settings: primary care practices, outpatient clinics, communities, other | • 1/2 studies favoured multifaceted vs. educational meetings | ||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 5 | |||
Hulscher (2001) [21] | N: 55 studies | 7/8 comparisons (across N = 6 studies) state multifaceted interventions are more effective than single interventions | Generally effective (88%) |
Interventions to Implement Prevention in Primary Care | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after | • 5/6 comparisons favoured multifaceted vs. group education (5 studies) | |
Populations: physicians, nurses, other | • 2/2 comparisons favoured multifaceted vs. reminders (2 studies) | ||
Settings: primary care practices, outpatient clinics, medical centres | Â | ||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 5 | |||
Jamtvedt (2006) [22] | N: 118 studies | 6/19 studies state multifaceted interventions are more effective than single interventions (audit and feedback alone). | Generally ineffective (32%) |
Audit and Feedback: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes | Study designs: randomized controlled trials | Â | |
Population: any kind of health-care professional | |||
Setting: any kind of organization | |||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 8 | |||
Legare (2012) [27] | N: 21 | 2/3 studies state multifaceted interventions are more effective than single interventions | Mixed effects (67%) |
Patients' Perceptions of Sharing in Decisions: A Systematic Review of Interventions to Enhance Shared Decision Making in Routine Clinical Practice | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, cluster randomized controlled trials | • 2/2 studies favoured multifaceted vs. patient mediated | |
Populations: physicians | • 0/1 study favoured multifaceted vs. educational meeting | ||
Settings: primary care practices, outpatient clinics, hospitals, pharmacies, communities | Â | ||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 7 | |||
Marinopoulos (2007) [23] | N: 136 studies | 6/8 studies state multifaceted interventions (use of multiple media) are more effective than single interventions | Generally effective (75%) |
Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, before-after, observational | • 3/5 studies favoured multifaceted over distribution of educational materials | |
Populations: physicians, pharmacists, nurses, other | • 2/2 studies favoured multifaceted over educational meetings | ||
Settings: primary care practices, hospitals, long-term care facilities | • 1/1 study favoured multifaceted over audit and feedback | ||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 7 | |||
O'Brien (2007) [24] | N: 69 studies | 12/12 studies state multifaceted interventions are more effective than single interventions | Generally effective (100%) |
Educational Outreach Visits: Effects on Professional Practice and Health Care Outcomes | Study designs: randomized controlled trials | • 3/3 studies favoured multifaceted vs. audit and feedback | |
Populations: any kind of health-care professional | • 7/7 studies favoured multifaceted vs. distribution of educational materials | ||
Settings: primary care practices, outpatient clinics, nursing homes, hospitals, pharmacies, communities | • 1/1 study favoured multifaceted vs. educational meetings | ||
• 1/1 study favoured multifaceted vs. reminders | |||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 8 | |||
Weinmann (2007) [25] | N: 18 studies (in 17 papers) | 2/5 studies state multifaceted interventions are more effective than single interventions (distribution of educational materials) | Mixed effects (40%) |
Effects of Implementation of Psychiatric Guidelines on Provider Performance and Patient Outcome: Systematic Review | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, before-after | ||
Populations: physicians, nurses, pharmacists, mental health clinicians, medical assistants | |||
Settings: primary care practices, hospitals, communities | |||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 5 | |||
Wensing (1994) [6] | N: 75 studies | 1/3 studies state multifaceted interventions more effective than single interventions | Mixed effects (33%) |
Single and Combined Strategies for Implementing Changes in Primary Care: A Literature Review | Study designs: randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, before-after, cohort | • 0/1 study favoured multifaceted over distribution of educational materials | |
Populations: physicians | • 0/1 study favoured multifaceted over reminders | ||
Settings: primary care practices | • 1/1 study favoured multifaceted over audit and feedback | ||
AMSTAR (quality) score: 4 |