"I should have discharged him but I felt guilty": a qualitative investigation of clinicians' emotions in the context of implementing occupational therapy
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erin Riley|
|17 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Clarke|
|25 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynne Goodacre|
|8 Aug 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Niina Kolehmainen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Aug 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynne Goodacre|
|25 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Clarke|
|9 Sep 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Niina Kolehmainen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Sep 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Sep 2014||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2014||Article published||10.1186/s13012-014-0141-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.