Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: "I should have discharged him but I felt guilty": a qualitative investigation of clinicians' emotions in the context of implementing occupational therapy

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Riley
17 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Clarke
25 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynne Goodacre
8 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niina Kolehmainen
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynne Goodacre
25 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Clarke
9 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niina Kolehmainen
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
19 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
2 Oct 2014 Article published 10.1186/s13012-014-0141-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement