Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Thorpe
8 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo Rycroft-Malone
10 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Hutchinson
17 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Damschroder
27 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Gaglio
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Damschroder
23 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Gaglio
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Bridget Gaglio
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Jul 2014 Editorially accepted
28 Aug 2014 Article published 10.1186/s13012-014-0096-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement