A systematic review of the quality of reporting in published smoking cessation trials for pregnant women: an explanation for the evidence-practice gap?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Chamberlain|
|14 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bridie Kent|
|27 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jamie Bryant|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jamie Bryant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|20 Aug 2014||Article published||10.1186/s13012-014-0094-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.