This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Quality improvement collaboratives and the wisdom of crowds: spread explained by perceived success at group level
© Dückers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 15 August 2013
Accepted: 27 June 2014
Published: 22 July 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mathilde Strating|
|29 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Quanbeck|
|6 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carola Orrego|
|28 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Michel Dückers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Quanbeck|
|7 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mathilde Strating|
|26 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Michel Dückers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/s13012-014-0091-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.