Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rachel McEvoy
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stacy Carter
12 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mandy Stanley
18 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Hutchinson
15 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rachel McEvoy
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stacy Carter
3 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Rachel McEvoy
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Dec 2013 Editorially accepted
2 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-9-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement