From: Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program
Keystone | Matching Michigan |
---|---|
1. One cohort | 1. Four cohorts (97% of English ICUs), including one pilot |
2. Kicked off with 6 weeks of ‘immersion’ weekly teleconferences | 2. Kicked off with data collection training |
3/Whole-state workshops every six months—1.5 or 2 days (overnight), gradually becoming participant-led | 3. Each cohort attended two ‘training events’ (0.5 or 1 day)—data collection and intervention |
4. Continuous contact via teleconferences with 100~200 | 4. Teleconferences only at the beginning; discontinued after poor attendance. Webinars continued, but generally not well attended. |
5. 5/6 months getting started with data collection & implementing the comprehensive unit-based safety program and daily goals; then Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia (VAP) and CVC-BSI interventions. | 5. Initial period (3-6months according to cohort) of data collection only, then all interventions in any order. No VAP intervention. |
6. Interactive web-based data entry tool allowing comparison with others | 6. Interactive web-based data entry tool allowing comparison with others |
7. Program team asked for infection rates to be reported by infection control practitioners independent of the ICUs. | 7. ICUs allowed to determine method of data collection and reporting for themselves. Detailed definitions and guidance provided. |
8. Targeted adult ICUs primarily | 8. Targeted both adult and paediatric ICUs |
9. Led by collaboration between prestigious out of state university and the state hospital association | 9. Led by government agency |