Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Heather Colquhoun
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerjo Kok
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvia Hysong
10 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo Rycroft-Malone
23 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - Heather Colquhoun
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sylvia Hysong
14 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Heather Colquhoun
Resubmission - Version 4
14 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Heather Colquhoun
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
10 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-8-66

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement