Skip to main content

Table 2 Modifications and adaptations made to programs and interventions

From: Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions

Decision maker (overall kappa = 0.80, n = 261)

Frequency

% of total modifications

 

Individual practitionera

55

21

 

Team or group of practitioners

24

9

 

Administrator

2

<1

 

Researcher

22

8

 

Intervention developer or purveyorb

70

27

 

Coalition of stakeholdersc

76

29

 

Unknown/insufficient information

12

5

 

Contextual modifications (overall kappa = 1.00, n = 41)

Frequency

% of contextual modifications

% of total modifications

Format

8

25

3

Setting

6

19

2

Personnel

10

3

4

Population

8

25

3

Training and evaluation Processes

9

-

3

Content modifications (n = 217)

Frequency

% of content modifications

% of total modifications

Level (overall kappa = 0.79)

   

Individual recipient

14

6

5

Cohort

14

6

5

Populationd

71

33

28

Provider/facilitator

20

9

8

Unite

38

18

15

Hospital/organization

22

10

9

Network/communityf

38

18

15

Nature of modification (overall kappa = 0.87)

   

Tailoring/tweaking/refiningf

73

34

28

Adding elementsg

62

29

24

Removing elementsg

33

15

13

Shortening/condensingh

17

8

7

Lengthening/extending

12

6

5

Substituting elements

5

2

2

Re-ordering elements

4

2

2

Integrating another approach into the intervention

3

1

1

Integrating the intervention into another approach

2

1

1

Departing from the intervention (“Drift”)

1

<1

<1

Loosening structure

1

<1

<1

Repeating elements

1

<1

<1

  1. Note: Three modifications that were identified in the articles did not contain sufficient detail to be rated.
  2. aRaw agreement for this category was 100%.
  3. bRaw agreement for this category was 82%.
  4. cRaw agreement for this category was 73%.
  5. dRaw agreement for this category was 87%.
  6. eRaw agreement for this category was 67%.
  7. fRaw agreement for this category was 91%.
  8. gRaw agreement for these categories was 83%.
  9. hRaw agreement for this category was 86%.