Open Peer Review Reports for: Innovations in major system reconfiguration in England: a study of the effectiveness, acceptability and processes of implementation of two models of stroke care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 18 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Naomi Fulop |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Dec 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Jan 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
