The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl May|
|8 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Penelope Hawe|
|23 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl May|
|6 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jo Rycroft-Malone|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|9 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-8-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.