Skip to main content

Table 2 Data extracted at stage four

From: Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments

Data extracted

Description1

Instrument development

Methods used to generate items (e.g., items derived from existing instruments; new items generated from data from interviews or comprehensive review of theory)

 

Methods used to refine instrument

Administration & scoring

Method of administration (e.g., self-administered, facilitated)

 

Feasibility of administration (e.g., researcher time, resources)

 

Acceptability to respondents (e.g., views on burden and complexity)

 

Methods of scoring and analysis

Measurement properties

Methods and findings of assessments of:

 

Content validity (e.g., clear description of content domain and theoretical basis, expert assessment of items for relevance and comprehensiveness)

 

Construct validity

 

- Hypothesis testing (e.g., whether scores on the instrument converge with measures of theoretically related variables, discriminate between groups, predict relevant outcomes)

 

- Instrument structure (e.g., using factor analytic methods)

 

Reliability (e.g., internal consistency, stability over time, inter-rater)

 

Responsiveness

Other assessments

Interpretability (potential for ceiling and floor effects; guidance on what constitutes an important change or difference in scale scores)

 

Generalizability (sampling methods, description of sample, and response rate reported)

  1. 1Definitions of the extracted measurement properties are provided in Additional file 3.