Skip to main content

Table 6 Statistical justification for aggregating data to the unit level

From: Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess barriers to feeding critically ill patients

 

Site specific barrier score mean ± SD

Variance components

  

F-test P-value

Questionnaire items

Site 1

Site 2

Site 3

Site 4

Site 5

σb 2*

σw 2#

ICC^

ICC (35)&

 

N

37

32

36

29

52

     

Overall Barriers

32.2 ± 26.9

31.3 ± 20.9

33.3 ± 33.3

39.9 ± 35.5

26.8 ± 19.0

7.67

522.66

0.01

0.34

0.2

Subscale 1: Guideline Recommendations and Implementation Strategies

27.5 ± 28.6

38.2 ± 25.0

22.4 ± 27.9

26.4 ± 21.6

21.4 ± 21.0

0.00

602.27

0.00

0.00

0.77

Current scientific evidence supporting some nutrition interventions is inadequate to inform practice.

23.8 ± 31.9

28.7 ± 34.2

18.6 ± 29.8

29.5 ± 30.3

22.4 ± 26.7

0.00

908.80

0.00

0.00

0.6

The language of the recommendations of the current guidelines for nutrition are not easy to understand.

28.7 ± 33.9

26.4 ± 34.9

18.6 ± 29.8

33.3 ± 33.3

12.2 ± 27.8

46.18

998.05

0.04

0.62

0.03

The current guidelines for nutrition are not readily accessible when I want to refer to them.

35.2 ± 35.6

31.1 ± 31.5

24.5 ± 35.1

34.6 ± 35.2

33.3 ± 35.5

0.00

1196.27

0.00

0.00

0.71

No feeding protocol in place to guide the initiation and progression of enteral nutrition.

25.0 ± 33.2

25.3 ± 34.1

31.4 ± 33.3

26.2 ± 29.2

19.6 ± 28.4

0.00

984.31

0.00

0.00

0.56

Current feeding protocol is outdated.

23.8 ± 36.7

16.0 ± 29.8

19.0 ± 30.6

15.4 ± 25.4

20.7 ± 26.8

0.00

891.70

0.00

0.00

0.8

Subscale 2: Delivery of Enteral Nutrition to the Patient

33.0 ± 31.2

38.2 ± 25.0

39.3 ± 27.0

54.6 ± 29.0

30.5 ± 22.5

62.18

714.14

0.08

0.75

0.005

Delay in physicians ordering the initiation of EN.

33.3 ± 39.0

41.1 ± 28.6

43.5 ± 36.4

49.4 ± 39.6

30.1 ± 29.0

29.36

1175.27

0.02

0.47

0.11

No feeding tube in place to start feeding.

31.5 ± 39.0

24.4 ± 34.9

37.0 ± 33.6

59.5 ± 34.4

26.3 ± 31.9

155.32

1197.87

0.11

0.82

0.0006

Delays in initiating motility agents in patients not tolerating enteral nutrition (i.e., high gastric residual volumes).

25.9 ± 37.5

35.6 ± 37.1

33.3 ± 30.9

53.6 ± 36.7

24.4 ± 28.1

97.41

1124.24

0.08

0.75

0.004

Delays and difficulties in obtaining small bowel access in patients not tolerating enteral nutrition (i.e., high gastric residual volumes).

34.3 ± 37.8

48.9 ± 32.4

40.7 ± 34.8

56.8 ± 33.1

32.1 ± 31.6

70.09

1150.70

0.06

0.68

0.02

In resuscitated, hemodynamically stable patients, other aspects of patient care still take priority over nutrition.

39.8 ± 35.5

41.1 ± 33.5

41.7 ± 34.2

53.6 ± 37.8

37.3 ± 35.1

0.00

1236.48

0.00

0.00

0.39

Subscale 3: Critical Care Provider Attitudes and Behavior

27.9 ± 30.3

44.7 ± 29.5

20.8 ± 26.2

31.8 ± 29.5

33.0 ± 24.3

51.15

764.14

0.06

0.70

0.01

Non-ICU physicians (i.e., surgeons, gastroenterologists) requesting patients not be fed enterally.

34.4 ± 33.3

60.0 ± 32.0

24.1 ± 33.4

30.9 ± 33.2

32.7 ± 36.2

148.80

1154.98

0.11

0.82

0.0006

Nurses failing to progress feeds as per the feeding protocol.

22,2 ± 34.7

35.6 ± 38.1

14.8 ± 25.8

27.4 ± 31.5

34.0 ± 35.2

44.12

1115.92

0.04

0.58

0.05

Fear of adverse events due to aggressively feeding patients.

28.7 ± 33.9

28.9 ± 34.7

23.1 ± 31.7

36.9 ± 36.7

24.2 ± 30.6

0.00

1096.86

0.00

0.00

0.48

Feeding being held too far in advance of procedures or operating room visits.

24.8 ± 34.6

54.4 ± 38.6

21.3 ± 31.7

33.3 ± 36.3

41.8 ± 33.2

143.22

1166.23

0.11

0.81

0.0006

Subscale 4: Dietitian Support

33.3 ± 37.1

37.9 ± 28.0

28.1 ± 28.3

40.4 ± 25.7

23.4 ± 21.7

35.26

710.07

0.05

0.63

0.03

Waiting for the dietitian to assess the patient.

27.6 ± 40.8

34.4 ± 33.3

27.8 ± 33.3

37.0 ± 33.8

21.8 ± 28.7

7.73

1137.44

0.01

0.19

0.32

Not enough dietitian time dedicated to the ICU during regular weekday hours.

21.3 ± 33.0

34.4 ± 33.3

21.9 ± 33.3

35.7 ± 38.4

11.5 ± 24.6

76.09

1014.70

0.07

0.72

0.005

No or not enough dietitian coverage during evenings, weekends and holidays.

30.6 ± 38.5

52.2 ± 37.8

29.5 ± 35.9

51.2 ± 34.5

32.1 ± 30.9

91.75

1241.46

0.07

0.72

0.009

There is not enough time dedicated to education and training on how to optimally feed patients.

27.8 ± 29.3

32.2 ± 35.1

31.5 ± 31.8

36.9 ± 35.5

28.1 ± 30.1

0.00

1011.24

0.00

0.00

0.78

Subscale 5: ICU Resources

42.9 ± 32.8

28.7 ± 29.5

23.1 ± 30.7

43.7 ± 34.3

20.5 ± 24.4

95.09

892.58

0.10

0.79

0.0009

Not enough nursing staff to deliver adequate nutrition.

18.5 ± 29.2

17.8 ± 27.3

17.6 ± 34.3

38.1 ± 42.3

10.3 ± 23.4

76.36

953.62

0.07

0.74

0.006

Enteral formula not available on the unit.

53.7 ± 44.6

33.3 ± 37.1

32.4 ± 36.1

42.9 ± 38.3

17.9 ± 28.4

149.67

1330.97

0.10

0.80

0.0003

No or not enough feeding pumps on the unit.

56.5 ± 42.0

37.9 ± 38.5

19.4 ± 32.2

50.0 ± 38.0

33.3 ± 33.7

172.74

1343.58

0.11

0.82

0.0003

  1. Variance components calculated using mixed linear regression model with Restricted Maximum Likelihood estimation (REML): *= (i.e., ICU), σb 2 = between group (i.e., ICU) variance # σw 2 = within group (i.e., ICU) variance ^ICC = Intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) = σb 2 / (σb 2 + σw 2) &ICC(1,35) = σb 2/( σb 2 + σw 2/k) where k = 35 respondents per group.
  2. Bolded text = overall and subscale results.