Framework domain | Item | Median | Interquartile range | Mode | Range | Don’t know (%) | Missing (%) | Endorsement (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part A: General barriers | ||||||||
Institutional Characteristics | 1. Overall, our unit functions very well together as a team. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 6.0 | 3 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 96.2 |
Institutional Characteristics | 2. Our ICU team engages in joint decision-making in planning, coordinating and implementing nutrition therapy for our patients. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 93.6 |
Institutional Characteristics | 3. Overall, it is easy for me to openly talk with other members of the ICU team about matters related to the nutritional needs of my patient. | 7.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 1 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 95.7 |
Institutional Characteristics | 4. In our ICU, implementing best practices, as defined by clinical practice guidelines, is intrinsic to our culture. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 6.0 | 2 – 7 | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.5) | 93.0 |
Institutional Characteristics | 5. Our ICU Managers/Directors are supportive of implementing nutrition guidelines. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 2 – 7 | 7 (3.8) | 1 (0.5) | 82.7 |
Provider Intent | 6. Nutrition is very important for my critically ill patients. | 7.0 | 7 – 7 | 7.0 | 6 – 7 | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.5) | 98.9 |
Provider Intent | 7. I feel responsible for ensuring that my patients receive adequate nutrition while in the ICU. | 7.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 5 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 3 (1.6) | 99.5 |
Provider Intent | 8. I am familiar with our current national guidelines for nutrition in the ICU. | 6.5 | 4 – 6 | 6.0 | 2 – 7 | 10 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 67.2 |
Provider Intent | 9. If the recommendations of the current national guidelines for nutrition are followed in our ICU, patient outcomes will improve. | 6.0 | 5 – 7 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 | 19 (10.2) | 0 (0.0) | 77.4 |
Part B. Guideline recommendations for enteral nutrition | ||||||||
Provider Intent | 1. Enteral nutrition should be used in preference to parenteral nutrition. | 7.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 4 – 7 | 3 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 95.7 |
Provider Intent | 2. Enteral nutrition should be initiated early (24 – 48 hours following admission to ICU). | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 3 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 0 (0.0) | 97.9 |
Provider Intent | 3. An evidence-based feeding protocol should be used. | 7.0 | 6 – 7 | 7.0 | 2 – 7 | 1 (0.5) | 1 (0.5) | 96.8 |
Provider Intent | 4. If a feeding protocol is used, it should tolerate a higher gastric residual volume (i.e., >250 mls) before holding feeds. | 6.0 | 3 – 7 | 7.0 | 1 – 7 | 9 (4.8) | 1 (0.5) | 60.5 |
Provider Intent | 5. In patients who have feed intolerance (i.e., high gastric residual volumes, emesis) a promotility agent should be used. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 | 3 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 96.2 |
Provider Intent | 6. Small bowel feeding should be considered for those select patients who repeatedly demonstrate high gastric residual volumes and are not tolerating adequate amounts of enteral nutrition delivered into the stomach. | 6.0 | 6 – 7 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 | 10 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 91.4 |
Provider Intent | 7. Patients receiving enteral nutrition should have the head of the bed elevated to 45 degrees. | 6.0 | 5 – 7 | 7.0 | 1 – 7 | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.1) | 78.3 |
Provider Intent | 8. In all critically ill patients, hyperglycemia (blood glucose >10 mmol/l or 180mg/dl) should be avoided by minimizing intravenous dextrose and using insulin administration when necessary. | 6.0 | 6-7 | 6.0 | 2-7 | 2 (1.1) | 0 (0.0) | 94.6 |
Part C: Barriers to the provision of enteral nutrition in the Intensive Care Unit | ||||||||
Institutional characteristics | 1. Not enough nursing staff to deliver adequate nutrition. | 3.0 | 2 – 5 | 1.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 2 (2.2) | 30.2 |
Institutional characteristics | 2. Not enough dietitian time dedicated to the ICU during regular weekday hours. | 3.0 | 2 – 6 | 2.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 38.1 |
Institutional characteristics | 3. No or not enough dietitian coverage during weekends and holidays. | 5.0 | 3 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 60.8 |
Institutional characteristics | 4. Enteral formula not available on the unit. | 4.0 | 2 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 4 (2.2) | 50.0 |
Institutional characteristics | 5. No or not enough feeding pumps on the unit. | 5.0 | 2 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 58.0 |
Guideline characteristics | 6. Current scientific evidence supporting some nutrition interventions is inadequate to inform practice. | 4.0 | 2 – 5 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 13 (7.0) | 46.8 |
Guideline characteristics | 7. The current national guidelines for nutrition are not readily accessible when I want to refer to them. | 5.0 | 2 – 6 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 7 (3.8) | 55.3 |
Guideline characteristics | 8. The language of the recommendations of the current national guidelines for nutrition are not easy to understand. | 4.0 | 2 – 5 | 4.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 11 (5.9) | 38.3 |
Implementation Process | 9. Not enough time dedicated to education and training on how to optimally feed patients. | 5.0 | 3 – 6 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 6 (3.2) | 57.8 |
Implementation Process | 10. No feeding protocol in place to guide the initiation and progression of enteral nutrition. | 4.0 | 2 – 5 | 1.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 7 (3.8) | 45.3 |
Implementation Process | 11. Current feeding protocol is outdated. | 4.0 | 2 – 5 | 4.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 13 (7.0) | 34.1 |
Provider intent | 12. Delay in physicians ordering the initiation of EN. | 5.0 | 3 – 6 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 65.2 |
Provider intent | 13. Waiting for the dietitian to assess the patient. | 4.0 | 2 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 6 (3.2) | 48.3 |
Provider intent | 14. Non-ICU physicians (i.e., surgeons, gastroenterologists) requesting patients not be fed enterally. | 5.0 | 3 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 6 (3.2) | 57.8 |
Provider intent | 15. Nurses failing to progress feeds as per the feeding protocol. | 4.0 | 2 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 4 (2.2) | 45.6 |
Provider Intent | 16. Fear of adverse events due to aggressively feeding patients. | 4.0 | 2 – 5 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 48.6 |
Provider Intent | 17. Feeding being held too far in advance of procedures or operating room visits. | 5.0 | 2 – 6 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 6 (3.2) | 58.9 |
Provider Factor | 18. No feeding tube in place to start feeding. | 5.0 | 2 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 4 (2.2) | 54.4 |
Patients Factor | 19. Delays in initiating motility agents in patients not tolerating enteral nutrition (i.e., high gastric residual volumes). | 5.0 | 3 – 6 | 5.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 4 (2.2) | 55.5 |
Patient Factor | 20. Delays and difficulties in obtaining small bowel access in patients not tolerating enteral nutrition (i.e., high gastric residual volumes). | 5.0 | 4 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 67.4 |
Patient Factor | 21. In resuscitated, hemodynamically stable patients, other aspects of patient care still take priority over nutrition. | 5.0 | 4 – 6 | 6.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 5 (2.7) | 68.0 |
Institutional characteristic/Patient Factor | 22. Lack of agreement among ICU team on the best nutrition plan of care for the patient. | 3.0 | 2 – 5 | 2.0 | 1 – 7 |  | 4 (2.2) | 32.4 |