Covariates for all facilities | Data source | Construct from CFIR |
---|---|---|
Patient characteristics: | Administrative Data- NPR | Â |
• Gender | ||
• Race | ||
• Age | ||
• Military service period | ||
• Psychiatric Diagnoses | ||
• Indication of a history of homelessness | ||
• History of substance use disorder | ||
Presence of PRRC at site | Administrative Data- MHS maintained | Inner Setting- Implementation Climate- Compatibility |
Presence of LRC when Re-Engage was Rolled Out | Administrative Data- MHS maintained | Inner Setting- Readiness for Implementation- Available Resources |
Facility Complexity | Administrative Data | Inner Setting- Structural Characteristics |
Number of Vets on List | Re-Engage Program Records | Intervention Characteristics- Complexity |
Overall facility size | Administrative Data | Inner Setting- Structural Characteristics |
Number of SMI Vets associated with Facility | Administrative Data- NPR | Inner Setting- Structural Characteristics |
Academic Affiliation of facility | Administrative Data- Ascertained via US News & World Report Med School Rankings | Inner Setting- Culture |
Urban/Rural Facility | Administrative Data | Inner Setting- Structural Characteristics |
Whether the site or VISN viewed Re-Engage as a research project | Technical Assistance Minutes | Either: Characteristics of Individuals- Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention OR Characteristics of the Intervention- Intervention Source |
The performance of other VAs in VISN on SMI Re-Engage Implementation | Re-Engage Program Records | Outer Setting- Peer Pressure |
Covariates for sites receiving enhanced REP | Data source | Construct from CFIR |
Number of Facilitation Contacts with Site | Facilitator Notes | Process- Executing |
Number of Facilitation Contacts with VISN Mental Health Leadership | Facilitator Notes | Process- Executing |
Did the Facility adapt SMI Re-Engage and use a Team approach? | Facilitator Notes | Intervention Characteristics- Adaptability |
Was there evidence that SMI Re-Engage was a priority in VISN or at site? | Facilitator Notes | Inner Setting- Implementation Culture- Relative Priority |
Did the LRC perceive available time (or resources) in order to do the required aspects of the SMI Re-Engage program? | Facilitator Notes | Inner Setting- Readiness for Implementation- Available Resources |
Does the VISN Mental Health Lead/seem to have a positive view of SMI Re-Engage? | Facilitator Notes | Characteristics of Individuals- Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention |
Does the LRC at a site seem to have a positive view of SMI Re-Engage? | Facilitator Notes | Characteristics of Individuals- Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention |
Does the VISN Mental Health Lead accurately understand SMI Re-engage? | Facilitator Notes | Characteristics of Individuals- Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention |
Does the LRC accurately understand SMI Re-Engage? | Facilitator Notes | Characteristics of Individuals- Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention |
Does the LRC feel capable of executing the tasks associated with SMI Re-Engage? | Facilitator Notes | Characteristics of Individuals- Self-efficacy |