Table 2 KT intervention with corresponding KTA phases
WHAT PART OF THE KTA CYCLE DID THE INTERVENTION IMPACT? | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KT INTERVENTION | Creating knowledge | Localising knowledge | Identifying barriers | Redressing barriers | Maintaining use | WHO IMPLEMENTED IT? |
Before RCT | Managers | |||||
Strategic planning meetings | • | • | • | • | Human Resources | |
Knowledge brokers | ||||||
Policy Makers | ||||||
Policy changes (policies developed however not implemented until RCT) | • | • | Managers | |||
Provision of paid, dedicated EBP time | Human Resources | |||||
Provision of a policy endorsed EBP mentoring program | Knowledge brokers | |||||
Mandated and compulsory use of psychometrically sound outcome measures with all clients embedded in workflow e.g., included within mandatory Individual Family Service Plans | Policy Makers | |||||
Evidence alert system development | • | Research Investigators | ||||
During RCT (8-weeks; June – Aug 2009) | ||||||
Skills training workshops (three-days) | • | • | • | • | Peers | |
Knowledge Brokers | ||||||
Paid EBP time, mentoring, compulsory use of outcome measures (see policy changes above), documentation changes including reminder systems | • | • | • | |||