Skip to main content

Table 2 Perceptions of organizational-level change efficacy and change commitment

From: Organizational factors associated with readiness to implement and translate a primary care based telemedicine behavioral program to improve blood pressure control: the HTN-IMPROVE study

 

N

Mean

Standard deviation

Fairly/very confident

Not at all/A little confident

Don’t know

Efficacy (Imp. Group)

      

Use resources effectively

71

3.28

0.70

82%

8%

10%

Encourage clinicians to try program

74

3.20

0.72

80%

14%

6%

Coordinate implementation efforts

72

3.25

0.62

82%

9%

9%

Support clinicians as they adjust

71

3.15

0.71

74%

17%

9%

Solve implementation problems

72

3.19

0.74

78%

13%

9%

    

Fairly/Very Committed

Not At All/A Little Committed

Don’t Know

Commitment (Imp. Group)

      

Committed

56

3.45

0.69

64%

8%

28%

Motivated

58

3.41

0.73

64%

10%

26%

Willing

59

3.53

0.65

69%

6%

25%

    

Somewhat/Very Much

Not At All/A Little

Don’t Know

Want to

53

3.68

0.51

67%

1%

32%

    

Fairly/Very Committed

Not At All/A Little Committed

Don’t Know

Commitment (User Group)

      

Committed

61

2.84

0.80

56%

25%

19%

Motivated

61

2.80

0.87

49%

32%

19%

Willing

61

2.82

0.85

55%

26%

19%

    

Somewhat/Very Much

Not At All/A Little

Don’t Know

Want to

51

3.16

0.86

56%

12%

32%

Change Valence

   

Strongly Agree/Agree

Strongly Disagree/Disagree

Don’t Know

Need for change

74

3.55

0.53

97%

1%

1%

Relative advantage

57

3.26

0.67

67%

9%

24%

Perceived fit

68

3.34

0.66

84%

7%

9%

Informational Assessment

      

Knowledge of task requirements

56

2.91

0.82

52%

23%

25%

Resources availability

57

2.75

0.87

51%

27%

22%

Timing

57

3.02

0.79

64%

15%

21%

Competing priorities

60

2.47

0.85

32%

48%

20%

Time availability

60

2.73

0.78

51%

29%

20%

    

Yes

No

Don’t Know

Presentation attendance

74

0.25

0.46

24%

73%

3%

  1. Note. Commitment was assessed from two perspectives: the implementation group and the user group. The implementation group references a small, core group of people that play a leading role in implementing the program. The user group references clinicians who were expected to support the program (e.g., making referral, provide staffing).