Skip to main content

Table 4 Average rating from 2010, 2011, and 2012 IRI evaluations by fellows

From: The implementation research institute: training mental health implementation researchers in the United States

  Average SD Range
Logistics    
Timeliness of acceptance decisions 4.67 0.47 3–5
Adequacy of information I received prior to the IRI to prepare me for the IRI 4.49 0.65 3–5
Organization of the IRI schedule 4.29 0.65 3–5
Informal Training    
Professional caliber of other fellows 4.96 0.20 4–5
Collaboration with fellows 4.67 0.52 4–5
Interactions with non-core faculty 4.65 0.60 3–5
Mentoring    
Likelihood of pursuing further professional relationships with faculty and fellows 4.88 0.39 3–5
Interactions with core faculty 4.76 0.52 3–5
Helpfulness of feedback from faculty on pilot and NIH proposal 4.66 0.60 3–5
Helpfulness of feedback from faculty on my ideas 4.63 0.60 3–5
Helpfulness of peer support from other fellows on ideas 4.47 0.68 3–5
Assistance received with study design 4.30 0.72 3–5
Overall    
Likelihood of recommending IRI to colleagues 4.92 0.35 3–5
Satisfaction with IRI program 4.84 0.42 4–5
  1. Note: 1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = fair; 4 = good; 5 = very good.