Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patchy ‘coherence’: using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gavin Daker-White
8 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tracy Finch
10 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Scholl
15 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Glyn Elwyn
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Glyn Elwyn
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Glyn Elwyn
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Aug 2013 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2013 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-8-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement