Domain | Definition | Element | Examples |
---|---|---|---|
Adaptability | The guideline is available in a variety of versions for different users or purposes | Sources | Internet, peer reviewed journal |
Versions | Full text, summary, print, digital | ||
Users | Tailored for patients or caregivers | ||
Useability | Content is organized to enhancethe ease with which the guideline can be used | Navigation | Table of contents |
Evidence | Narrative, tabulated or both | ||
Recommendations | Narrative, graphic (algorithms) or both; Recommendation summary (single list in full or summary version rather than dispersed) | ||
Validity | Evidence is summarized and presented such that its quantity and quality are apparent | Number of references | Total number of distinct references to evidence upon which recommendations are based |
Evidence graded | A system is used to categorize quality of evidence supporting each recommendation | ||
Number of recommendations | Total number of distinct recommendations | ||
Applicability | Information is provided to help interpret and apply guidelines for individual patients | Clinical considerations | Information such as indications, criteria, risk factors, drug dosing that facilitates application of the recommendations explicitly highlighted as tips or practical issues using sub-titles or text boxes, or summarized in tables and referred to in recommendations or narrative |
Communicability | Resources for providers or patients to inform, educate, support and involve patients | Inform, educate, support | Informational, educational or supportive resources for patients/caregivers, or contact information (phone, fax, email or URL) for such resources |
Decision making | Questions or tools for clinicians to facilitate discussion with patients, or decision aids to support patient involvement | ||
Relevance | The focus or purpose of the guideline is explicitly stated | Objective | Explicitly stated purpose of guideline (clinical, education, policy, quality improvement) |
Stakeholders | Specify who would deliver (individuals, teams, departments, institutions, managers, policy makers, internal/external agents) and receive the services (specify type of patients) | ||
Needs | Identification of stakeholder needs, perspectives, interests or values | ||
Accommodation | Anticipated changes, resources and competencies required to adapt and accommodate guideline utilization are identified | Technical | Equipment or technology needed, or the way services should be organized |
Regulatory | Industrial standards for equipment or technology, or policy regarding their use | ||
Human resources | Type and number of health professionals needed to deliver recommended services | ||
Professional | Education, training or competencies needed by clinicians/staff to deliver recommendations | ||
Workflow | Anticipated changes in workflow or processes during/after adoption of recommendations | ||
Costs | Direct or productivity costs incurred by acquiring resources or training to accommodate guidelines, or as a result of service reductions during transition from old to new processes | ||
Implementation | Processes for planning and applying local strategies to promote guideline utilization are described | Identify barriers | Individual, organizational, or system barriers that could challenge adoption, or instructions for local needs assessment of guideline users |
Tailor guideline | Instructions, tools or templates to tailor guideline/recommendations for local context | ||
Integrated tools | Point-of-care templates/forms (clinical assessment, standard orders) to integrate guidelines within care delivery processes | ||
Promote utilization | Possible mechanisms by which to promote guideline utilization | ||
Evaluation | Processes for evaluating guideline implementation and utilization are described | Implementation | Methods for evaluating the implementation process |
Utilization | Audit tools or performance measures/quality indicators to assess the organization, delivery and outcomes of guideline recommended care |