The organizational social context of mental health services and clinician attitudes toward evidence-based practice: a United States national study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bryan Weiner|
|16 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorna McKee|
|30 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown|
|20 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Gregory Aarons|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bryan Weiner|
|10 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lorna McKee|
|12 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown|
|6 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Gregory Aarons|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jun 2012||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-7-56|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.