Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Knowledge translation of research findings

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
31 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Wallin
31 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou
22 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou
4 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars Wallin
16 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Grimshaw
Resubmission - Version 6
8 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
31 May 2012 Editorially accepted
31 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement