Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical guidelines contribute to the health inequities experienced by individuals with intellectual disabilities

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Craig Melville
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Oct 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sara Twaddle
10 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
28 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Craig Melville
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Atle Fretheim
9 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sara Twaddle
16 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Craig Melville
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Craig Melville
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
11 May 2012 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-7-42

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement