Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
20 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Martin
24 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
30 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Bertels
7 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Bertels
13 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Martin
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
8 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Mar 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2012 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-7-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement