Skip to main content

Table 1 Results for CCDSS trials of acute care

From: Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes

Study

Methods Score

Indication

No. of centres/providers/patients

Process of care outcomes

CCDSS Effecta

Patient outcomes

CCDSS Effect a

Management Assistants - Alerts and Reminders

Terrell, 2009 [48]

9

CCDSS provided alerts to avoid inappropriate prescriptions in geriatric outpatients during discharge from emergency care.

1/63*/5,162'

ED visits by older adults that resulted in prescriptions for ≥1 of nine targeted inappropriate medications.

+

...

...

Peterson, 2007 [36]b

4

CCDSS provided dosing advice for high-risk drugs in geriatric patients in a tertiary care academic health centre.

1/778/2,981*

Ratio of prescribed to recommended doses.

+

...

...

Kroth, 2006 [39]

7

CCDSS identified low temperature values and generated prompts to repeat measurement in order to improve accuracy of temperature capture by nurses at the bedside of non-critical care hospital patients.

.../337*/90,162

Low temperatures recorded by nursing personnel type.

+

...

...

Rood, 2005 [34]

8

CCDSS recommended timing for glucose measurements and administration of insulin in critically ill patients.

1/104/484*

Deviation between advised and actual glucose measurement times; Time that patients' glucose levels were within specified range over 10 weeks; Adherence to guideline for timing of glucose measurement.

+

...

...

Zanetti, 2003 [47]

8

CCDSS provided alarm and alert for redosing of prophylactic antibiotics during prolonged cardiac surgery.

1/.../447*

Intraoperative redose of antibiotics.

+

Surgical-site infection.

0

Selker, 2002 [29]

8

CCDSS generated recommendations for management of thrombolytic and other reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

28/.../1,596*

Detection of ST-segment elevation without AMI; Receipt of thrombolytic therapy; Receipt of thrombolytic therapy and contraindications; Treatment of patients with AMI.

0

Mortality; Stroke; Thrombolysis-related bleeding events requiring transfusion.

0

Dexter, 2001 [19]

10

CCDSS provided guideline-based reminders for preventive therapies in hospital inpatients.

...*/202/3,416

Hospitalizations with an order for therapy; Hospitalizations during which therapy was ordered for an eligible patient.

+

...

...

Kuperman, 1999 [23]

4

CCDSS detected critical laboratory results for all medical and surgical inpatients and alerted health provider that the results were ready.

1/.../...*

Length of time interval from filing alerting result to ordering of appropriate treatment; Filing time and resolution of critical condition.

+

Adverse events within 48 hours of alert.

0

Overhage, 1997 [26]

8

CCDSS identified corollary orders to prevent errors of omission for any of 87 target tests and treatments in hospital inpatients on a general medicine ward.

1*/92/2,181

Compliance with corollary orders; Pharmacist intervention with physicians for significant errors.

+

LOHS; Serum creatinine level.

0

Overhage, 1996 [25]

10

CCDSS provided reminders of 22 US Preventive Services Task Force preventive care measures for hospital inpatients, including cancer screening, preventive screening and medications, diabetes care reminders, and vaccinations.

1*/78/1,622

Compliance with preventive care guidelines.

0

...

...

White, 1984 [31]

4

CCDSS identified concerns (drug interactions or signs of potential digoxin intoxication) in inpatients taking digoxin.

1/.../396*

Physician actions related to alerts.

+

...

...

Management Assistants - Guidelines and algorithms

Helder, 2008 [43]

6

CCDSS generated recommendations for management of incubator settings in neonatal ICU.

1/117/136*

Days to regain birthweight.

0

Intraventricular haemorrhage; Sepsis; Mortality.

0

Davis, 2007 [42]

9

CCDSS provided evidence-based data relating to appropriate prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in paediatric outpatients.

2/44*/12,195

Prescriptions consistent with evidence-based recommendations.

+

...

...

Rothschild, 2007 [37, 38]

7

CCDSS generated recommendations for non-emergent inpatient transfusion orders.

1/1,414*/3,903

Appropriateness ratings of decision support interventions.

+

Severely undertransfused patients.

0

Kuilboer, 2006 [41]

10

CCDSS assisted monitoring and treatment of asthma and COPD in daily practice in primary care.

32*/40/156,772

Contacts; Peak total flow; Peak flow ratio; FEV1; FEV1 ratio measurements; Antihistamines prescriptions; Cromoglycate prescriptions; Deptropine prescriptions; Oral bronchodilators prescriptions; Oral corticosteroids prescriptions.

0

...

...

Paul, 2006 [40]

10

CCDSS assisted management of antibiotic treatment in hospital inpatients.

15*/.../2,326

Appropriate antibiotic treatment.

+

Duration of hospital; Duration of fever; Mortality.

0

Brothers, 2004 [46]

6

CCDSS provided recommendations for surgical management of patients with peripheral arterial disease.

2/3/206*

Agreement between surgeon's initial and final treatment plan.

0

...

...

Hamilton, 2004 [44]

8

CCDSS provided evaluation and recommendations of labour progress and need for caesarean sections.

7/.../4,993*

Caesarean sections.

0

Recorded indication of dystocia; Apgar score.

0

Hales, 1995 [20]

4

CCDSS evaluated appropriateness of inpatient admissions.

1/.../1,971*

Unnecessary hospital admissions.

0

...

...

Wyatt, 1989 [33]

5

CCDSS generated recommendations resulting in identification of high-cardiac risk patients among patients with chest pain attending the ED.

1/15/153*

Overall management accuracy; Time until cardiac care unit admission.

...

...

...

Diagnostic Assistants

Roukema, 2008 [35]

6

CCDSS provided advice for the diagnostic management for children with fever without apparent source in the ED.

1/15/164*

Test ordering.

+

Time spent at ED.

0

Stengel, 2004 [45]

8

CCDSS assisted electronic documentation of diagnosis and findings in patients admitted to orthopaedic ward.

1/6/78*

Diagnoses per patient.

+

...

...

Bogusevicius2002 [15]

7

CCDSS generated diagnosis of acute SBO in surgical inpatients.

1/.../80

Diagnosis of acute SBO; Diagnosis of partial SBO; Time to diagnosis.

0

Bowel necrosis; Morbidity; Mortality; LOHS; Proportion of patients receiving each type of surgical procedure: open lysis of adhesion; laparoscopic lysis of adhesion; bowel resection.

0

Medication Dosing Assistants

Cavalcanti, 2009 [49]

8

CCDSS recommended insulin dosing and glucose monitoring to achieve glucose control in patients in ICU.

5/60/168*

BG measurements obtained per patient; Time with BG controlled.

+

BG during ICU stay; Hypoglycaemia.

+/0

Saager, 2008 [50]

6

CCDSS recommended insulin dosing and glucose assessment frequency for diabetic patients in cardiothoracic ICU.

1/.../40*

BG in range (90 to 150 mg/dL); Time in range.

+

Mean BG; Mean time to BG<150 mg/dL.

+

Peterson, 2007 [36]b

4

CCDSS provided dosing advice for high-risk drugs in geriatric patients in a tertiary care academic health centre.

1/778/2,981*

Ratio of prescribed to recommended doses.

+

...

...

Poller, 1998 [28]

3

CCDSS provided dosing for oral anticoagulants in outpatients with AF, DVT or PE, mechanical heart valves, or other indications.

5/.../285*

Time within target INR range for all patients and all ranges; Proportion of time in target range.

+

...

...

Vadher, 1997 [30]

6

CCDSS provided dosing recommendations for warfarin initiation and maintenance for inpatients and outpatients with DVT, PE or systemic embolus, AF, valve disease, or mural thrombus, or who needed prophylaxis.

1/49/148*

Time to reach therapeutic range; Time to reach stable dose; Time to first pseudoevent; Days at INR 2 to 3.

0

Mortality; Haemorrhage events; Thromboembolism events.

...

Casner, 1993 [18]

3

CCDSS predicted theophylline infusion rates for inpatients with asthma or COPD.

1/.../47*

Serum theophylline levels; Absolute difference between final and target theophylline levels; Mean difference between target and mean final theophylline level; Subtherapeutic final theophylline levels; Toxic final theophylline levels.

0

Theophylline-associated toxicity; LOHS; Duration of treatment.

0

Burton, 1991 [16]

6

CCDSS provided aminoglycoside dosing for inpatients with clinical infections.

1*/.../147

Beginning aminoglycoside dose; Ending aminoglycoside dose; Ending aminoglycoside dose interval; Peak aminoglycoside level; Peak aminoglycoside level >4 mg/L; Trough aminoglycoside levels; Proportion of patients with trough aminoglycoside levels ≥2 mg/L; Length of aminoglycoside therapy.

0

Proportion of patients cured; Response to therapy; Treatment failure; Mortality; Indeterminate response; Nephrotoxicity; LOHS; LOHS after start of antibiotics.

0

Begg, 1989 [14]

4

CCDSS provided individualised aminoglycoside dosing for inpatients receiving gentamicin or tobramycin.

.../.../50*

Achievement of peak and trough aminoglycoside levels.

+

Mortality; Creatinine clearance during therapy.

0

Gonzalez, 1989 [22]

5

CCDSS estimated aminophylline loading and maintenance dosing for ED patients.

.../.../67*

Aminophylline loading dose to achieve target serum theophylline level; Aminophylline maintenance dose to achieve target serum theophylline level; Theophylline level.

+

Discharged from ED within 8 hours; Adverse effects; Peak flow rate throughout the study.

0

Hickling, 1989 [21]

3

CCDSS provided dosing and dose intervals of aminoglycoside in critically ill patients.

1/.../32*

Proportion of patients outside of therapeutic range; Peak plasma aminoglycoside levels; Trough levels; Proportion of patients with 48-72 h peak plasma levels.

+

Estimated creatinine clearance during recovery.

0

Carter, 1987 [17]

2

CCDSS provided dosing recommendations for warfarin initiation and adjustments in hospital inpatients.

1/.../54*

Days from administration of first warfarin dose to achievement of stabilization dosage.

0

Time to discharge.

...

White, 1987 [32]

6

CCDSS provided dosing recommendations for warfarin therapy in patients hospitalized with DVT, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, PE or AF.

2/.../75*

Time to reach a stable therapeutic dose; Time to reach a therapeutic PR ratio; Patients with PR above therapeutic range during hospital stay; Predicted/observed PR; Absolute error.

+

LOHS; In-hospital bleeding complications.

+

Hurley, 1986 [24]

8

CCDSS provided dosing for theophylline in inpatients with acute air-flow obstruction.

1/.../96*

Theophylline levels above therapeutic range; Theophylline levels below therapeutic range; Trough theophylline levels in therapeutic range during oral therapy; Serum theophylline levels; 1st serum level during oral therapy; Trough levels during oral therapy.

0

Peak expiratory flow rate; Air flow obstruction symptoms; Side effects; Mortality.

0

Rodman, 1984 [27]

6

CCDSS recommended lidocaine dosing for patients in intensive or coronary care units.

1/.../20*

Plasma lidocaine levels in middle of therapeutic range.

+

Toxic response requiring lidocaine discontinuation or dosage reduction.

0

  1. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BG, blood glucose; CCDSS, computerized clinical decision support system; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ED, emergency department; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; ICU, intensive care unit; INR, international normalised ratio; LOHS, length of hospital stay; PE, pulmonary embolus; PR, prothrombin ratio; SBO, small bowel obstruction.
  2. *Unit of allocation.
  3. aOutcomes are evaluated for effect as positive (+) or negative (-) for CCDSS, or no effect (0), based on the following hierarchy. An effect is defined as ≥50% of relevant outcomes showing a statistically significant difference (2p < 0.05):
  4. 1. If a single primary outcome is reported, in which all components are applicable, this is the only outcome evaluated.
  5. 2. If >1 primary outcome is reported, the ≥50% rule applies and only the primary outcomes are evaluated.
  6. 3. If no primary outcomes are reported (or only some of the primary outcome components are relevant) but overall analyses are provided, the overall analyses are evaluated as primary outcomes. Subgroup analyses are not considered.
  7. 4. If no primary outcomes or overall analyses are reported, or only some components of the primary outcome are relevant for the application, any reported prespecified outcomes are evaluated.
  8. 5. If no clearly prespecified outcomes are reported, any available outcomes are considered.
  9. 6. If statistical comparisons are not reported, 'effect' is designated as not evaluated (...).
  10. bStudy included in two categories.