Skip to main content

Table 2 Recall and recall-to-yield ratio

From: Identifying quality improvement intervention publications - A comparison of electronic search strategies

Search strategy

Recall AHRQ

set

(n = 25)

Recall SQUIRE set

(n = 29)

Recall EPOC set

(n = 26)

Recall Across sets

Recall:Yield Ratio

Strategy #1:QI text words, simple (quality AND improv* AND intervention*)

(PubMed)

11

(44%)

7

(24%)

16

(62%)

43%

0.00319

Strategy #2: QI text words, simple ((quality AND improv$ AND intervention$).mp) MEDLINE, Ovid)

10

(40%)

5

(17%)

14

(54%)

37%

0.00287

Strategy #3: QI text words, synonyms (PubMed)

12

(48%)

10

(34%)

20

(77%)

53%

0.00148

Strategy #6: QI text words, synonyms AND MeSH terms;

(MEDLINE, Ovid)

7

(28%)

6

(21%)

9

(35%)

28%

0.00361

Strategy #8: QI text words, synonyms AND Intervention components

(MEDLINE, Ovid)

11

(44%)

9

(31%)

9

(35%)

37%

0.00337

Strategy #9: CQI methods

(MEDLINE, Ovid)

2

(7%)

2

(7%)

0

(0%)

5%

0.00210

Strategy #10: Combined approach

(MEDLINE, Ovid)

8

(32%)

9

(31%)

14

(54%)

39%

0.00236

  1. * notates truncation; Recall: Number of identified reference set publications; Recall:Yield Ratio: % recall across reference sets divided by total yield