Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management: protocol for an interrupted time series design

  • Monika Kastner1, 5Email author,
  • Anna Sawka2,
  • Kevin Thorpe3, 5,
  • Mark Chignel4,
  • Christine Marquez5,
  • David Newton5 and
  • Sharon E Straus5, 6
Contributed equally
Implementation Science20116:77

Received: 16 May 2011

Accepted: 22 July 2011

Published: 22 July 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
16 May 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Monika Kastner
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
22 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-77

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
Division of Endocrinology, University Health Network and University of Toronto
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto