Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How can continuing professional development better promote shared decision-making? Perspectives from an international collaboration

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Ryan
18 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lyndal Trevena
27 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - France Légaré
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - France Légaré
Resubmission - Version 3
30 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - France Légaré
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - France Légaré
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
5 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
5 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-68

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement