Skip to main content

Table 5 Network characteristics by groups of monitoring (BMI/Weight, systolic blood pressure, and creatinine)

From: Patient Care Teams in treatment of diabetes and chronic heart failure in primary care: an observational networks study

  

No comprehensive monitoring

Comprehensive monitoring

Significance

Size and diversity

    

Treatment

Number of professionals

7,08

9,67

0,025

 

Different disciplines

5,08

4,33

0,222

Advice

Number of professionals

6,56

9,57

0,029

 

Different disciplines

5,00

4,29

0,299

Monitoring

Number of professionals

6,87

8,80

0,085

 

Different disciplines

4,67

4,00

0,160

Density

    

Treatment

Density

0,4707

0,4941

0,566

 

Number of connections

13,31

27,33

0,078

Advice

Density

0,3416

0,3653

0,662

 

Number of connections

10,89

24

0,009

Monitoring

Density

0,4600

0,4748

0,817

 

Number of connections

13,67

25,80

0,265

Centrality

    

Treatment

Network centralization

49,72

54,93

0,314

 

Most centralized health prof.

GP

GP

 
 

Degree of most central health prof.

82,54

89,63

0,381

 

Patient's degree centrality

53,44

51,69

0,987

Advice

Network centralization

37,58

45,46

0,365

 

Most centralized health prof.

GP

GP

 
 

Degree of most central health prof.

61,57

66,01

0,897

 

Patient's degree centrality

48,33

57,30

0,518

Monitoring

Network centralization

50,05

50,25

0,967

 

Most centralized health prof.

GP

GP

 
 

Degree of most central health prof.

82,25

85,84

0,604

 

Patient's degree centrality

56,48

46,78

0,672

Overlap

    
 

Treatment - advice

0,8014

0,7066

0,076

 

Treatment - monitoring

0,8807

0,8661

0,910

 

Advice - monitoring

0,7838

0,7416

0,391