Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roland Bal
15 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lanis Hicks
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Murray
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Murray
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Murray
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
7 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Murray
Resubmission - Version 8
7 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
19 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement