Skip to main content

Table 10 Professional interventions: Appraisal of systematic review (AMSTAR) scores and intervention effectiveness ratings by research team

From: The landscape of knowledge translation interventions in cancer control: What do we know and where to next? A review of systematic reviews

Intervention cluster and systematic review first author (year)

Scores and ratings

 

AMSTAR (1 to 11)

Research team ratings

  

Mean

SD

Educational outreach visit & audit and feedback interventions

   Goldberg (2007b) [36]

3

4.6

0.89

   O'Brien (2007) [44]

8

4.8

1.17

   Goldberg (2007c) [36]

3

3.8

0.98

   Jamtvedt (2006) [40]

8

4.7

0.82

   Overall mean score

5.5

4.5

IT/IM/informatic interventions

   Goldberg (2007d) [36]

3

3.7

0.52

   Garg (2005) [34]

5

5.3

0.52

   Ammenwerth (2008) [23]

6

5.7

0.52

   Beach (2006a) [25]

5

5.7

1.03

   Shojania (2009) [50]

8

4.7

0.52

   Overall mean score

5.4

5.0

Local opinion leader interventions

   Doumit (2007) [31]

7

4.3

0.82

Tailored interventions

   Baker (2010) [24]

7

4.8

1.47

Clinical pathway interventions

   Rotter (2010)a [46]

--

NA

NA

Guidelines for professions allied to medicine

   Thomas (2009)a [53]

--

NA

NA

Discharge planning from hospital to home

   Shepperd (2010)a [49]

--

NA

NA

  1. aThese reviews were included post hoc, identified by members of the research team.
  2. IT = information technology; IM = information management.