Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown
18 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Meterko
17 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kitty Chan
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Hendricks Brown
3 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kitty Chan
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kitty Chan
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
3 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1748-5908-6-115

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement