Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics of the guideline-updating process (n = 36)a

From: The updating of clinical practice guidelines: insights from an international survey

 

Answers

 

Yes

No

Unknown

 

n

(%)

n

(%)

n

(%)

Who decides the need for updating b

      

   Guideline group

18

(50.0)

18

(50.0)

--

 

   Expert committee

15

(41.7)

21

(58.3)

--

 

   Guideline coordinator

9

(25.0)

27

(75.0)

--

 

   Other

9

(25.0)

27

(75.0)

--

 

   Standing editorial staff

6

(16.7)

30

(83.3)

--

 

Who participates in the updating process c

      

   Original guideline authors

32

(88.9)

--

 

4

(11.1)

   Staff of organization

30

(83.3)

--

 

6

(16.7)

   New group of experts

25

(69.4)

4

(11.1)

7

(19.4)

   Original information managers/specialist

21

(58.3)

5

(13.9)

10

(27.8)

   Original external reviewers

20

(55.6)

6

(16.7)

10

(27.8)

   Patients

13

(36.1)

11

(30.6)

12

(33.3)

   Others

7

(19.4)

5

(13.9)

24

(66.7)

Which part of the guidelines get checked c

      

   Full text

29

(80.6)

2

(5.6)

5

(13.9)

   All recommendations

29

(80.6)

1

(2.8)

6

(16.7)

   Key questions

25

(69.4)

1

(2.8)

10

(27.8)

   Key recommendations

25

(69.4)

--

 

11

(30.6)

   Annexes

20

(55.6)

3

(8.3)

13

(36.1)

   Patient information

19

(52.8)

5

(13.9)

12

(33.3)

Which kind of search run b

      

   Original search strategies plus some horizon scanning

20

(55.6)

16

(44.4)

--

 

   Original searches strategies modified to be specific rather than sensitive

14

(38.9)

22

(61.1)

--

 

   Original search strategies

10

(27.8)

26

(72.2)

--

 

   Other

7

(19.4)

29

(80.6)

--

 
  1. aAnalysis of institutions updating guidelines; bClosed-ended questions yes/no; cAggregation responses yes/partially.