This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Usability evaluation of a clinical decision support tool for osteoporosis disease management
- Monika Kastner†1Email author,
- Danielle Lottridge†2,
- Christine Marquez†3,
- David Newton†3 and
- Sharon E Straus†1, 3
© Kastner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 June 2010
Accepted: 10 December 2010
Published: 10 December 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gillian Hawker|
|29 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jim Warren|
|13 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Monika Kastner|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Monika Kastner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Dec 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Monika Kastner|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|8 Dec 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Dec 2010||Editorially accepted|
|10 Dec 2010||Article published||10.1186/1748-5908-5-96|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.