Skip to main content

Table 4 Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) familiarity and use over time

From: Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: a before-after intervention study

GMFCS Familiarity GMFCS Use
EAST1 EAST + WEST
High versus [Some + None]2 High versus Some3
Time Interval OR 95% CI p-value Time Interval OR 95% CI p-value
Baseline to 6 mos 7.2 2.0 to 25.9 <0.01 Baseline to 6 mos 18.2 5.5 to 60.1 <0.01
6 to 12 mos 1.5 0.2 to 9.5 0.67 6 to 12 mos 1.8 0.3 to 10.6 0.49
12 to 18 mos 0.8 0.1 to 6.2 0.84 12 to 18 mos 0.8 0.1 to 4.8 0.80
     East versus West 17.7 4.1 to 76.3 <0.01
WEST1 EAST + WEST
High versus [Some + None]2 Some versus None3
Time Interval OR 95% CI p-value Time Interval OR 95% CI p-value
Baseline to 6 mos 378.1 12.2 to 11676.1 <0.01 Baseline to 6 mos 11.8 2.4 to 57.7 <0.01
6 to 12 mos 5.8 0.0 to 1123.6 0.51 6 to 12 mos 0.5 0.0 to 8.8 0.67
12 to 18 mos 0.1 0.0 to 31.6 0.48 12 to 18 mos 1.6 0.0 to 50.0 0.80
     East versus West 15.0 1.7 to 134.3 0.01
High versus [Some + None]2 High versus Some3
Organizational Characteristics OR 95% CI p-value Organizational Characteristics OR 95% CI p-value
Research culture 3.6 1.5 to 8.7 0.01 Research culture 1.6 0.8 to 3.2 0.16
Supervisor expectation 1.5 0.7 to 2.9 0.29 Supervisor expectation 2.0 1.0 to 3.9 0.04
     Some versus None3
     Organizational Characteristics OR 95% CI p-value
     Research culture 3.0 1.1 to 7.9 0.03
     Supervisor expectation 2.6 1.1 to 6.0 0.03
  1. 1Time × Region Interaction;
  2. 2 Response Categories = High/Some + None
  3. 3Response Categories = High/Some/None
  4. OR = odds ratio
  5. CI = confidence interval