Skip to main content

Table 4 Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) familiarity and use over time

From: Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: a before-after intervention study

GMFCS Familiarity

GMFCS Use

EAST1

EAST + WEST

High versus [Some + None]2

High versus Some3

Time Interval

OR

95% CI

p-value

Time Interval

OR

95% CI

p-value

Baseline to 6 mos

7.2

2.0 to 25.9

<0.01

Baseline to 6 mos

18.2

5.5 to 60.1

<0.01

6 to 12 mos

1.5

0.2 to 9.5

0.67

6 to 12 mos

1.8

0.3 to 10.6

0.49

12 to 18 mos

0.8

0.1 to 6.2

0.84

12 to 18 mos

0.8

0.1 to 4.8

0.80

    

East versus West

17.7

4.1 to 76.3

<0.01

WEST1

EAST + WEST

High versus [Some + None]2

Some versus None3

Time Interval

OR

95% CI

p-value

Time Interval

OR

95% CI

p-value

Baseline to 6 mos

378.1

12.2 to 11676.1

<0.01

Baseline to 6 mos

11.8

2.4 to 57.7

<0.01

6 to 12 mos

5.8

0.0 to 1123.6

0.51

6 to 12 mos

0.5

0.0 to 8.8

0.67

12 to 18 mos

0.1

0.0 to 31.6

0.48

12 to 18 mos

1.6

0.0 to 50.0

0.80

    

East versus West

15.0

1.7 to 134.3

0.01

High versus [Some + None]2

High versus Some3

Organizational Characteristics

OR

95% CI

p-value

Organizational Characteristics

OR

95% CI

p-value

Research culture

3.6

1.5 to 8.7

0.01

Research culture

1.6

0.8 to 3.2

0.16

Supervisor expectation

1.5

0.7 to 2.9

0.29

Supervisor expectation

2.0

1.0 to 3.9

0.04

    

Some versus None3

    

Organizational Characteristics

OR

95% CI

p-value

    

Research culture

3.0

1.1 to 7.9

0.03

    

Supervisor expectation

2.6

1.1 to 6.0

0.03

  1. 1Time × Region Interaction;
  2. 2 Response Categories = High/Some + None
  3. 3Response Categories = High/Some/None
  4. OR = odds ratio
  5. CI = confidence interval