Items | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|
Sufficient expert panel support | ||
1.1 The collaborative chairperson was an opinion leader | 4.10 | 0.697 |
1.2 The expert panel provided information and advice for changes | 4.11 | 0.655 |
1.3 The collaborative chairperson was an expert on the QIC topic | 4.45 | 0.686 |
1.4 The expert panel provided sufficient time for our project | 4.03 | 0.687 |
1.5 The expert panel provided positive feedback for our project | 3.95 | 0.702 |
1.6 The expert panel was experienced in successfully improving the care process for the QIC topic | 4.09 | 0.758 |
1.7 The expert panel contributed scientific knowledge | 4.25 | 0.742 |
1.8 The expert panel contributed practical experience | 4.18 | 0.778 |
Effective multidisciplinary teamwork | ||
2.9 Collaborative participation was carefully prepared and organised | 3.84 | 0.894 |
2.10 General goals of the collaborative were clear | 4.29 | 0.549 |
2.11 My team supported the collaborative's general goals | 4.29 | 0.617 |
2.12 Management provided sufficient means and time | 3.48 | 1.170 |
2.13 Management followed project progress | 3.22 | 1.115 |
2.14 Management prioritised success | 3.37 | 0.963 |
2.15 Team members were directly involved in changes | 4.37 | 0.600 |
2.16 Team members had relevant expertise | 4.41 | 0.539 |
2.17 Team members had leadership skills | 4.12 | 0.794 |
2.18 Teams were motivated in implementing changes | 4.19 | 0.637 |
2.19 Roles in my team were clearly defined | 3.93 | 0.755 |
2.20 Participation in this project enhanced multidisciplinary collaboration in my organization | 4.15 | 0.743 |
2.21 My team focused on patient improvement | 4.31 | 0.572 |
2.22 My team focused on care-process improvement | 4.26 | 0.565 |
Appropriate use of the improvement model | ||
3.23 My team formulated clear goals | 4.02 | 0.737 |
3.24 My team focused on achieving goals | 4.05 | 0.719 |
3.25 Goals were discussed within organisation | 3.71 | 0.805 |
3.26 Goals were incorporated in organisation policy | 3.84 | 0.768 |
3.27 Goals were readily measurable | 4.04 | 0.669 |
3.28 My team gathered measurement data | 4.36 | 0.585 |
3.29 My team used measurements to plan changes | 3.93 | 0.862 |
3.30 My team used measurements to test changes | 3.68 | 0.996 |
3.31 My team used measurements to track progress | 4.11 | 0.734 |
3.32 My team considered continuous improvement a part of working process | 3.91 | 0.699 |
3.33 My team continued to aim for change | 3.63 | 0.802 |
3.34 My team tracked progress continuously | 3.80 | 0.754 |
Helpful collaborative processes | ||
4.35 Useful knowledge and skills we given to my team during working conferences | 3.88 | 0.699 |
4.36 Focus was on practical application of knowledge and skills at working conferences | 3.78 | 0.651 |
4.37 My team shared experiences at working conferences | 4.05 | 0.587 |
4.38 Working conferences focused on joint learning | 3.95 | 0.656 |
4.39 My team developed skills in planning changes at working conferences | 3.68 | 0.752 |
4.40 My team developed skills in processing changes at working conferences | 3.66 | 0.756 |
4.41 My team developed confidence in achievability of changes at working conferences | 3.88 | 0.721 |
4.42 Teams reflected on results at working conferences | 4.05 | 0.515 |
4.43 My team contacted coworkers from other organisations at working conferences | 3.77 | 0.815 |
4.44 My team learned from progress reporting by other teams at working conferences | 3.92 | 0.659 |
4.45 Teams received feedback on progress from expert panel at working conferences | 3.72 | 0.720 |
4.46 Teams supported one another at working conferences | 3.49 | 0.774 |
4.47 There was competition between teams during the joint working conferences | 2.74 | 0.996 |
4.48 There was a moment to reflect on achieved results | 3.96 | 0.607 |
4.49 Information, ideas, and suggestions were actively exchanged at working conferences | 3.65 | 0.694 |
4.50 Teams exchanged information outside working conferences | 2.73 | 0.968 |