Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria used to classify intervention effectiveness, with examples of outcomes reflecting each level of effectiveness

From: The importance of organizational characteristics for improving outcomes in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review of congestive heart failure

Outcome Score

Criteria

Example

0

• No statistically differences between control and intervention groups, or between intervention and baseline, on process or outcome measures

• No difference in adherence, NYHA class, # visits, or # hospitalizations

0.5

• Trends without significance

• Mixed outcomes (significant improvement in minority of measures)

• Significant improvement compared with baseline, but not with control

• Significant improvement in adherence, trends for CHF-related admission and total number of hospital days

1

• Statistically significant improvement:

-all outcomes if ≤3 endpoints

-majority of outcomes if > 3 endpoints

• Significant reduction in all-cause mortality and all-cause admissions at 3 months